During July 2007, a man phoned his former wife and alleged that she had slashed his car tyres. He may have rang twice. The woman was traumatised, doubly. And, it was said, she dissociated.
Dissociation is difficult to explain - but examples may assist. Amnesia that is psychological in origin is a form that appears more often in film and TV than in reality. Fugue states ditto. Then there is multiple personality disorder, now known more blandly as dissociative identity disorder – which some would hold is a US culture bound syndrome. A less dramatic form is depersonalization – a numbness, a tuning out, sometimes after some emotionally arousing event.
Understand all of that?
Back to the woman, Penelope Woodbridge, who dissociated after her ex gave her an earful. She turned to alcohol. And then she used her car – to pick up her daughter from school. En route, after being on the road for 20 minutes, she lost control of her car, crossed to the other side of the road, and collected a Toyota Starlet. Sadly a Starlet is not, as the name might suggest, a robust vehicle. The driver was seriously injured. His wife, in the front seat, died. Her name was Evette Haddad.
In Ms Woodbridge’s car was a part consumed bottle of wine. She refused to be breathalysed. A blood alcohol (BAL) estimation performed two hours later was 0.269. Which means that at the relevant time her BAL was likely to be around 0.30.
For most persons, a BAL of 0.3 would cause profound intoxication, probably to the extent of stupor, i.e. legless. Two conclusions can be confidently reached. Firstly, she had drunk a very substantial amount, much more than the half bottle of wine in her car. And secondly, in that she was even able to operate a car (albeit poorly), she had developed tolerance, indicating that there was something of a history.
It would also be likely that once sober she would not recall a thing – and this was what she told the court – not a thing after the call from her ex.
Penelope was charged, but opted for a psychiatric defence – that she had dissociated after the call from her husband, and that therefore she could not be held responsible for what then happened, namely drinking, driving, speeding, etc. she was acting automatically.
An expert was needed to say that this was the case. Step up Professor Carolyn Quadrio. 
Professor Quadrio is a mover and shaker on issues of trauma and gender. On the case of Penelope the court was told :
In his closing address yesterday, Mr Wasilenia [counsel] reminded the jury of evidence from a psychiatrist, Carolyn Quadrio, that Ms Woodbridge had a history of periods of dissociation, followed by periods of heavy drinking, after traumatic events.
Mr Wasilenia told the court that the call from Ms Woodbridge’s former husband, accusing her of slashing his tyres, was ”part of a long sequence of unpleasant, threatening behaviour” and set off her dissociative state.
The prosecution’s expert differed, pointing out for example that despite much earlier contact with health professionals dissociation had not surfaced as an issue. And the jury agreed with him. She was found Guilty of manslaughter.
Perhaps dissociation also leads to a lack of remorse or shame. Such a lack was suggested by the photo in the SMH reproduced below. Perhaps they’d just done lunch.


After the second attack the dog was pronounced to be depressed, and prescribed medication. Evidemment, a dog would have to be mentally unwell to want to attack the kindly M Chirac.







Just when you thought airport security could not get more trying, this man, Al-asiri, stuffed an explosive device up his rear end prior to attending a meeting he had arranged with a Saudi prince and security head. Once into Prince Nayef’s office the bum bomb was detonated by a mechanism that remains unclear.
Conservative political parties sometimes fret about what they call ‘ the doctors’ wives problem’.
Newcastle, NSW













